There’s no way that the EU rules as currently described can keep pace with AI development, just as it doesn’t even acknowledge the real risks of AI transforming how we work and live into a neatly choreographed mechanical ballet.
The true impacts of AI are too big and complicated, so those costs are simply left out of the value calculations for companies promoting the tech.
We already lie to one another quite effectively. AI represents far bigger challenges, like destroying our way of life and then the planet.
AI are going beyond their expected abilities to learn from existing data and inventing new ways to assess and apply it. Only they haven’t been coded to do it.
Warnings about AI risk are hypocritical, delusional, or disingenuous. Or all three.
The parallels between Mary Shelley’s fictional AI inventor and the real ones today are shocking and illustrative.
Behind the headlines about AI makers asking government to restrain them from destroying the world, their products are already doing it. I get the existential risk that someday, some AI could be so powerful that it could for some reason decide to take over or annihilate humanity. I’ve seen the Read more…
Robots have been making music for a long time. Maybe advanced AI is a hint that people need to get back into the mix?
The Writers Guild of America (WGA) announced last week that its members would go on strike because they get less work and pay producing content for more shows that air on streaming services. They also want to make sure AI doesn’t take their jobs away completely. Streaming shows are bad Read more…
Turns out that the folks making (and making $)from AI will be among the first who lose their jobs because of it. Sounds fair to me.