Lives Examined By AI
Why spend hours sitting with a group of people debating some arcane aspect of life when GPT-4 can summarize the conversation and provide a conclusion for you?
Why spend hours sitting with a group of people debating some arcane aspect of life when GPT-4 can summarize the conversation and provide a conclusion for you?
OpenAI’s research is just another entry into the corpus of blather intended to make us think that they care about ethics and safety as they (and other tech firms) madly race to develop more powerful and therefore more threatening AI.
Combine compute power with vast amounts of data and there’s no reason why machines couldn’t do pretty much anything that you do. They just have to learn all the different circumstances in which “this” leads to “that.”
The tech industry is doing the same thing it did with the metaverse and social media: its gibberish is announcing its intentions to make tons of money as it pursues cool projects.
Workers have been racing against technology to keep their jobs for centuries. AI will be an unbeatable opponent, so the final score will be Capital 1, Labor 0.
What’s for sure is that we don’t have to wonder when an AI will win a Golden Globe. It already has.
Add all of the blather about self-aware AI deciding one day to destroy humanity and you get a potent cocktail of distraction and reinvention that is existentially relevant right now.
And, as pixels resolve on web pages turning I realized my every moment now belonged to deep learning.
Let the folks behind AI get filthy rich but refuse to let them outsources the consequences and costs of their enrichment to us. The EU is silent on such things, so we need to speak up.
The idea of Artificial General Intelligence (“AGI”) posits a machine someday that has the ability to think like a human being. I wonder if the era of Artificial General Movement (“AGM”) isn’t a far more real and immediate issue?